Obscene Wages and Insurance

The Wages Today. I start with a disclaimer. Some of my family think I’m in my dotage. so take what I have to say with a pinch of salt. Donkey’s years ago when the lottery first started, arrogantly thinking I might win, I created a consortium to ensure that the family shared my luck, and the government failed to, I tried to assess what was the maximum amount of money I could possibly need, and came to the conclusion I couldn’t spend,(not waste),more than £500,000. Some of the family thought they could handle a million, but when put to it they were spending for spending’s sake. So I wonder why these footballers, entertainers and film actors are being paid such obscene amounts, millions a year, when they have no hope of ever being able or spend it, while those paying them with their bums on seats in the terraces and the cinemas, are in many cases being taken to the cleaners. Those in charge, or acting as agents have some responsibility, because they are on a percentage. When youngsters start out on a football career their main interest is in getting picked for a team, and I believe that while some of them have ambitions of avarice, the majority have come from a background where a few thousand is a fortune, and their sights are set on their own accomplishments rather than greed. Surely it is time that those on the terraces brought the major clubs to heel, because they are draining the minor leagues and not really giving value for money If you want to gauge how the average person feels about money in thousands, watch that slick, TV programme, Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. Recently there were three contestants who had arrived at £8000, with no safety net, but two were pretty sure of the answer which would give them £16,000. A sure £8000 meant so much, none went on, but two would have won the higher amount. These people were not poor, but they were not prepared to lose what they had gained. The staggering discrepancy between what these people valued and what some others believe they themselves are worth, and apparently are right to do so, is extraordinary, and defeats common sense, because the money the latter earn, at the cost of many who can’t afford the entrance fees, could not all be used, merely stored in some form. I am aware that some of these high earners perform and support charitable works, but so do people who contributed to their extortionate salaries.

Insurance It was thinking about insurance that directed my mind to the extortionate salaries being given in certain circumstances. I have recently been ripped off by an insurance company, using specious logic to disclaim my request. I have a daughter who carries a lot of her own insurance. This gave me an idea, that perhaps we could all take out our major insurance – for serious house damage, and third party liability, then for the rest, as a family, collectively carry our own insurance for the cars, the contents, minor house damage and anything else you care to think of.

I started looking back over my 60 odd years of property ownership and driving, and realised that what with preserving no-claims bonuses, I had made very few claims against insurance. In fact if I had carried my own insurance for all but the very serious damage to the house, and third-party liability, I would have a nice nest egg. Currently an awful lot of the companies that you think you’re insured with are in fact part of a group where the head company objects to paying claims. I wondered if these wealthy footballers and film stars have their money stashed away all over the place, and could consider acting as insurers for the serious damage to premises and third-party. How many houses do you know of where there has been serious damage? True, with climate change, whirlwinds (I nearly said twisters but that might have been misconstrued) and the like might become more prevalent but even then, as house insurance is a necessity demanded by mortgage lenders, it looks to me that this would be a sound investment, and enable the man in the street to get from under the insurance burden he is suffering today. I may be wrong, but I suspect insurers don’t compartmentalise their liabilities, they are lumped together, so when a disaster occurs somewhere in the world, say the sinking of the Titanic, the payout is partially coming from our premiums. – just a thought, it’s a form of bookmaking after all, just at a more polite level, and bookies lay off when the heat is on.

Insurance, which is based on fear, has really gone crazy, the other day I bought a tin opener for only a few quid and I was asked if I wanted to ensure it, for an additional 20%. Some commerce today is now based on implied fear. One only has to read the ads on television to see how insidious it is, especially if you don’t have a scientific background. We are pleaded to buy bottles and tablets of this and that to ensure that we don’t catch some unmentioned and unmentionable disease

Random Thoughts No. 6

School reports. A grandfather proudly showed me the reports of his 7 year old grandson .I hadn’t the heart to tell him what I really thought. It was divided into 19 separate categories with type-written reports in each category, the smallest, music, was 19 words long, the longest was roughly 42 words, and the average, about 30 words. Forgive me for being sceptical that these comments are as detailed an assessment as they appear. Two ex-teachers thought it was difficult to assess children of that age in any great degree. I don’t blame the schools, I blame the system which dictates targets, information and a host of other requirements not related to the teaching of the children. Assuming there are 30 children in the class, and these comment categories are required for each child, the teacher, or teachers, have to compose and write out, or dictate, 570 items in 17,000 words. This stretches my credibility, I just don’t believe it. What I suspect is that the teachers have standard phrases on a computer, and by tapping single codes these can be coupled together and put into the categories. The question that presents itself then, is whether this flowery language and extreme detail is truly representative. It doesn’t surprise me that a lot of schools and educational levels have gone down, because the teachers are wasting their time with this type of window dressing. In my day the teacher’s comments were handwritten and generally said something like ‘has the ability but could do better, ‘excellent’, or some other sparse comment. Then they used an alphabetical code which soon told the parents the child’s ability when read along with a pithy summary. The amount of work needed for this report, even assuming the computerisation, would have burdened either a teacher, or a combination of a teacher and a backroom staff, excessively. The teachers I spoke to are glad they are not teaching today

Bush really frightens me, has me waking up at night with the screaming hab-dabs. I have known ever since World War II, what I knew in Edinburgh in 1940, time and again depicted on television in race riots, Vietnam, and recent wars, that the American psyche is based on its own myths of the Wild West, of shoot first and ask questions afterwards. I find that Bush’s inarticulate delivery and vague bearing lead me to believe he is purely a mouthpiece for some very aggressive lobbyists. He seems to me to have about as much diplomatic delicacy as a seven pound sledge hammer. The trouble is this huge juggernaut called America, which for years was lying dormant, has suddenly woken up believing its own publicity, that it is a world leader. The precipitate action, and the unguarded utterances, with no reference to the outcome and the reactions of other nations, coupled with a strong political bias induced by the ethnic and fiscal balance at home, and subsidising rogue elements in other countries, should not be the stance of a great nation that considers itself to be a world leader, they are a prescription for strife.

The Olympics, the mummy run, and railways. I can imagine that you are wondering. what twisted mind can link these three items – money as usual, today it links everything. I am heartily against the 2012 Olympics in Britain because I believe over the next five years our public coffers will be empty as a result of the proposed new housing programme, the two wars, bringing the infrastructure up to the level that it is acceptable, without even wasting it on something which so few of us can enjoy, except visually on the box, and that could be the case wherever it was held. We need money seriously for public transport. We must reduce those rush hours constituted by the mummy run, grasp the parking problems in towns and cities, all created because of a lack of public transport of a quality and quantity to make it viable. I believe nationally, we spend a tremendous amount of money both in fines and on wages just for parking, let alone the vast amounts on renewal and the construction of trunk roads, bypasses, and increasing the strength of the existing network to accommodate ever heavier and longer vehicles. We really need to re-examine the whole of our transport philosophy, with a view to getting the individual back into busses and trains, even if it means heavily subsidising. The cost to the individual of using public transport, especially over long distances seems extortionate, especially when the conditions of travel and pricing seem so unacceptable. Even our local bus has seats that only children can sit in really comfortably, because health and safety have cut down on the number of people standing, and, it appears, the bus companies, needing the passengers to make it pay, have increased the number of seats in the same area.

Only those of us who lived at a time when all there was, was public transport, can be truly aware of what has been lost. Travelling on the Tube was always a torture, but on trams and buses one can relax and let the driver take the strain. In those days one didn’t have to wait long for trains, buses or trams, but today it is different.

Pre WW2, !930 to 39, in Search of Progress, 1920 to2000 plus

What follows here, and several other posts in this vein, are narrow views of one person, not over-views determined by research. They are done mainly to determine how life has changed over 80 years.

Take children; the phrase ‘children should be seen and not heard’, in its various forms, was a Victorian maxim people lived by in the 20s’s. Children’s opinions were rarely sought, they would sit in company, hardly moving, until given permission to go elsewhere, if they were lucky. Visiting relatives were rarely on speaking terms with them, and their visits occasioned the best of everything to be produced, and one had to be on one’s best behaviour. For a child to offer an opinion might be considered insolence, and could induce a crack round the ear. There was little or no traffic, other than horse-drawn vehicles or men pushing barrows.. Playing in the street therefore, was not only acceptable, it was expected. Children built up relationships with various delivery men, men with horse-drawn milk floats, coal men, bakers, and anyone else who would allow them to have a ride on their carts, in return for helping with deliveries, for a short time. Children ran after carts, and grabbed a lift on the back, when the driver wasn’t looking. Children either for the family, or to earn money, gathered the horse droppings in a bucket to use as fertiliser in back gardens.

The change clearly came, with the advent of commercial motor vehicles – a gradual process in which change was not really noticeable in the street, or in the general life of the children, until World War II, a period of nearly 20 years.

Family life; the two world wars seriously affected the size of families and the up bringing of children.. In the 20s and early 30s there were ‘Maiden Ladies’, unmarried women who lived at home, because the men they might have married were lying in rows, rotting in a foreign field. So the children of those who had married were looked after by their grandparents, their parents and the maiden aunts. Housing was in short supply with a building programme just getting underway. Hitler set it all back and once again extended families were forced to live together, resulting in children being cared for by a number of people. In the 60s all this changed, people’s aspirations became greater, with greater affluence, and a burgeoning housing programme. Families now lived in their own homes without the same amount of inter-parental care. There has been a steady change in domestic circumstances, through aspiration, necessity, or just keeping up with the Joneses, until we have arrived at the point where both parents are working, and the children are leading much less gregarious, and more singular lives.

In the 20s wages were low, transport took time, families were large, and extended families could be colossal, so every aspect of life was determined by these factors and the class system. Then the classes varied in size tremendously. The upper class was a small group, very wealthy, with a total disregard in most cases for the plight of the under classes. The upper middle-class consisted of professionals, very successful businessmen, the clergy, schoolteachers and those with inherited wealth. The lower middle class or artisan class, included shopkeepers, businessmen and the like. The rest, the biggest class, were rubbing along on what amounted in most cases to a minimum wage – the working-class. It was the class system as much as anything throughout those years, which determined the limits of family life. In the 20s the upper class and the upper middle-class, would go on Continental holidays, stay in hotels here and abroad, drive cars, live in detached houses, or terraced houses in selective neighbourhoods, or in the country. The lower middle class generally lived in small terrace houses, might run a car, would holiday at a seaside resort, staying in a boarding house.. The working-class holiday was taken on the local Commons or with daily trips, if they could afford holidays at all ..From the 20s up until about 1930 there was little change, but in the late 30s change became much more rapid. Traffic increased, Woolworths came to London and expanded throughout the country, making competition for the working-class’s spending more competitive, and therefore increasing choice automatically. Motor vehicles were being used for transportation, with the result that private vehicles were regularly coming down in size and cost, and hence more common. With more spending there was more affluence, even for the working-class and the cycle effected great changes in the social boundaries, producing a flow of movement upward and downward between the classes, the beginning of what we have today

Pre WW2,1930 to ’39. in order, Christian Science as I Found It

My Aunt became a Christian Scientist, influenced by an artist friend who lived in Manchester. She passed her ideas on to my mother and after a while my mother became a wishy-washy version herself, never quite at the heart of the movement, but reading a lot, which was a necessity, because Mrs Mary Baker-Eddy based the whole concept on a philosophical dissertation. In short, the theory, as I understood it then, stated that as we, according to the bible, were made in the image and likeness of God, there could be no such thing as matter, and if that was accepted, then there could be no sickness as that was brought about by the degeneration of matter, which, of course, did not exist. The big fallacy to that theory, but I was too young at the time to see it, was the question of who had thought up matter in the first place? They would probably say the Devil, but then who and more importantly why had he been thought up? Deep stuff! Ultimately too much for yours truly. The one part of the whole scenario I found disturbing was my mother’s illness culminating in death. She had contracted cancer and because of her beliefs made no call upon the Health Service.

With My Aunt a mover and shaker in the local CS church and my mother a willing, if part-time, acolyte, it was pretty well ordained that I would have to attend, and as I had tried everything else I had no valid excuse for back-sliding. I was enrolled in the Sunday School. The parishioners, if one could call them that when they hailed from a number of electoral parishes, were drawn from the ‘haves’, rather than the ‘have-nots’. It was and still is very much a middle-class religion and certainly a degree in philosophy would help in understanding the finer points of its doctrine. In my case I was a have-not, tagging along as a ‘have’ on the coat tails of my Aunt, so I had to mind my P’s and Q’s – although my Aunt would never have seen it that way.

I think the only real experience I have brought with me from those years is the memory of the hours I spent contemplating the balcony in the church hall where we held the Sunday School before joining the adults in the main body of the church to hear the readings from the Bible ‘with key to the scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy’. ‘Why the balcony?’ you might ask, and it would be a fair question.

Our teacher was extolling the merits of mind over matter and the fact that everything was a figment of our imagination because we were one with God and so we were a figment of his imagination and therefore our thoughts were his thoughts, so everything was OK. (Are you with me so far?) I completelyunderstood what she was getting at although my interpretation was a little different. To me she and the rest of the class did not exist, I had just conjured them up in a sort of dream. It therefore followed, according to her theory, which, of course had to be really mine, by definition, that if I chose to go up to the balcony and jump off I would land like a feather and be no worse. So I put it to her and she said that was true, providing – there is always a ‘providing’ – providing I had enough faith. From then on I kept trying to assess exactly how much faith it would take to achieve the impossible, but I never had quite enough to put it to the test. From then on I steadily edged toward agnosticism and then atheism and Sundays became a day of rest.

Pre WW2, 1930 to ’39, in order, Enforced Holidays 2

Floss was a handyman at Ramsgate’s huge funfair called Wonderland. He worked on the Big Dipper. Early every morning he sent two cars round the track loaded with sand bags, watching the reaction of the wooden structure as the car went round, to gauge any weaknesses. Next it was my turn for a free, if solitary ride, as a third check. Can you imagine what Health & Safety would make of that today?

Evening was the best time to be there, it was vibrant, with a cacophony of sound and a kaleidoscope of coloured lights winking on and off, and I absorbed the hectic atmosphere of the constantly eddying mass of humanity, along with the excitement of it all. When I went on these protracted holidays it was my practice, even duty, to return home with a small present for each of the family. This time I had had so many incursions into the wallet I was almost totally broke. What with the cinema trips, smoking, the funfair at Ramsgate and the even more expansive funfair at Margate, called Dreamland, I had only pence left and was at my wits end – well almost, I still had the slot machines to fall back on. Families descended like locusts on the one-armed-bandits. They were impatient to win and when the pickings were poor they too, like the locusts, moved on. It was then that I moved in, with just the odd penny here and there. I would give a heavily patronised machine, the opportunity to play one or two more games. Most times it worked. On the last evening I could not waste money on bus fares and cycled to the fairground. There I set about making enough from the slot machines to give me a fighting chance to win prizes at the stalls. Buying presents was out of the question, just a matter of playing the odds and knowing when to stop. Having increased my shilling into something like five, I went in search of other games of chance where I had reasonable odds, I won a glass bottomed tea tray, plaster of Paris elephants of all sizes, coated in black mica, a milk jug, toffee, and chocolates for Val. The things were equally disparate and cheap, but I was no connoisseur, merely a boy trying to get himself out of a jam. That night I cycled back to Pegwell Bay with the tyres birring happily along on the tarmac, a smile on my face which could not be rubbed off by the passage of the wind, no matter about the lonely days and the long hours spent touring for its own sake, the elation of that evening put it all behind and made that holiday one I never forgot,

It was at this time that I bought a packet of Will’s Goldflake cigarettes and sat in the cinema, in the afternoon, in the dark, enjoying a taste I was only once again able to enjoy. There is something about the taste of those first cigarettes one smokes which is indescribably satisfying – like the taste of real Naval rum, never to be experienced again. In fact it was many years later, when I restarted smoking after a longer than usual period of abstinence, that I savoured for a brief period that wonderful sensation and taste once again.

Pre WW2, 1930 to 1939, in order, Enforced Holidays

Parents used to make strange decisions, with the best intentions and even self- sacrifice, but with little realisation what they were condemning their children to. Single parenting is not, and never was, easy, conscience has to be weighed against pragmatism, welfare, economic resources and what is possible. My mother decided, I should not be kicking my heels throughout the summer holidays in London, so twice she sent me off, for a month on my own for a Holiday. Summer jobs were rare so vocational work was the exception. In the countryside, there was fruit picking or harvesting for nothing or a pittance, On the first occasion she took me to a boarding house in Worthing, introduced me, stayed a day or so, bought me a season ticket for a seat at the bandstand and left, giving the woman my pocket money to be doled out, a shilling daily, I was bored out of my mind, lonely, made no friends, and I sat and listened to the brass bands night after night.

The experiment was dropped for a year or two; then I was sent to stay with Floss and Val at Pegwell Bay, in Kent. Val was a roly-poly, rosy faced lady, with a sense of fun and generous nature, who had a handful of guests, mostly friends of the family. Floss was small, tough and rugged, an ex-regular soldier with service all round the world in various regiments He had laid paths round the house in concrete, with regimental badges picked out in coloured cement. He and Val amicably shared the house and one another when visitors were not in residence, but cohabitation was something only whispered. The house at Pegwell Bay was furnished with brass ornaments from India and the Middle East, colourful china, and rugs which Floss had brought home from his travels, and there were flowers everywhere, both inside and out. The hangings were of rich colours – Val herself was colourful, like a Gypsy, with red cheeks, dark hair and huge earrings always dangling to her shoulders.

The house below, on the road leading to the beach, was occupied by an AA man I found interesting, who covered the district on his yellow motor bike and sidecar. He had small children I played with, although I think I preferred to play with Val’s goat which I milked, and was tethered beside the house in a small pasture. The goat, knew me so well it would baa even when I was a quarter of a mile away. It always wanted to play butting games and its forehead of solid bone often caught me unawares in the thigh. The goat’s milk I accepted with tentative caution as I did the vegetable salads which contained fruit, more colourful than Mother’s – Val liked colour. I liked the salad no more than I did the milk but the outdoor life gave me an almost insatiable appetite.

Feeding birds, cats, the goat and a tortoise which hibernated in the cupboard over the cooker through the winter, together with Floss’s influence taught me much about the wider aspects of life – full justification for the working holiday experience, but much of it solitary. There was wonderful hay making, the hay transported in horse-drawn wains and stooked. The fun of building ricks with horseplay among the youngsters, the lunches brought to the field and the smell of the hay itself. I liked guiding the horses by the bridle when on roads, but was always fearful of their huge hooves. I also got jobs as a way of filling in the day, plum picking up tall rickety ladders, with a sort of apron bag in which to put the plums and filling wicker baskets, we were allowed to eat all we liked while we worked, and were paid on the number of baskets we filled. I didn’t get rich, but I did lose time with diarrhoea on the second day. I cycled to some of the Cinq Ports, Sandwich and Canterbury,. and wandered through the remnants of the invasion defences left from the First World War and to Manston and watched the RAF planes taking off and landing.

Down the road beside the bungalow I found another road running parallel with the beach and when I was cycling along there I was assailed with the marvellous scent of fresh lavender. I went into the lavender fields, which, like those in Grasse, in France, stretched in rows to fill the huge field. On the middle of one edge of the field was a gloomy wooden barn-like building which was store and shop and in there one could buy sachets to sweeten sheets in drawers, bottles of essence, hair grease in boot-polish-like tins, solid perfume blocks and sprays of all kinds and above everything was the concentrated smell of lavender. I was allowed to pick lavender and received sachets and hair grease for my trouble.

If you are a conscience ridden single parent, worried if your child should have a holiday, please make certain it is accompanied, or else forget it!

PreWW2, 1930 to ’39, School Excursions

PARIS Looking back to the 30s, and the way children accepted discipline almost unreservedly, and taking into account what we got up to in Paris, I am amazed that teachers still take School excursions today. One Easter we had a school excursion to Paris. We went everywhere and at or some places I think the teachers wished we had not gone, including the British Consulate. We were received royally given refreshment and shown great courtesy, but as luck would have it, they had an automatic passenger lift, which none of us had ever experienced before. All I remember was looking through the glass doors at frustrated people, standing on the landings, as the cab full of schoolboys, hurtled up and down at great speed.

We went to the Fete de Pains d’epice, The Gingerbread Fair, held on the outskirts of Paris. We went on every thing and did everything and came away with the conviction that the French, generally, could not throw. At some stalls we threw bundles of rags to demolish piles of tins arranged on a shelf, to win a bottle of cheap sparkling wine made up to look like champagne. As far as we were concerned we couldn’t lose and returned to the hotel armed with a great quantity of fizz. Obviously the corks came out immediately with interesting results. One boy was found leaning on a railing on a landing, overlooking the glazed dome over the dining room, saying, ‘I am a feeding the fishes,’ while scattering stale bread. I and another boy took a trip on the Metro and promptly got lost, causing a certain amount of worry, but it seemed not too much. The whole trip in fact was pretty laid back with the highlight of the trip to the Cluny Museum with all the excesses of the Revolution on display.

The journey home was a complete pantomime, firstly some were hobbling about with cigarette lighters in their shoes, not wishing to pay duty, and one in particular had a hypodermic syringe, in the days when drug abuse had not even been heard of. One of our party was very greedy, and had been the bane of the people whose table he shared. On the boat, about mid Channel, we consumed our generous packed lunches. Prior to that we followed the boy with the syringe to the washroom, where he proceeded to make a huge amount of strong soap suds, with which he filled the syringe, produced an orange, and injected it thoroughly. During the meal, he casually set his orange on the bench and said generally, ‘ Anyone fancy another orange?’ We all shouted that we wanted it. Predictably, Tubby grabbed and gobbled. He was fine when he hobbled painfully off the boat trying vainly to walk normally, with his shoes full of the contraband cigarette lighters he intended selling when we got back to school, but was not very well on the Dover to London train.

SWITZERLAND The trip to Switzerland was remarkable because we saw the real Switzerland, the country as it had been for tens if not hundreds of years, where women carried huge trumpet shaped baskets on their backs up rocky, unmade paths, where the houses they lived in were made of dry-stone walls with horrendous gaps between the stones, and mud floors. These hovels were probably their summer homes when the cattle were on the high slopes, but to us, straight from London, it all seemed terribly primitive.

Another find was the cigar, not in packets but on the broad naked thighs of peasant women high up there. Years later, in the Navy, I was to become familiar with leaf tobacco. On that trip I saw it for the first time in the raw, at a cigar factory in the mountains of Ascona. Some of the girls were stripping the leaves, others were doctoring them and moistening them, while a row of girls would form the leaves in a pattern, and having placed a fine stalk through as a mouthpiece, and positioned it at the end of the cigar tobacco, with a deft rolling action away from them they would start to roll the cigar on the bench, finishing it on their thigh, which, itself had become a deep rich brown, partly natural but mainly from the tobacco juice. Since all the later furore about cancer and nicotine, I have often wondered whether these women suffered in old age. On this trip I first rode in a charabanc, the open, petrol driven coach, where each bench seat had its own door, approached from the street, and the body of the vehicle extended some six to eight feet beyond the back axle, to give the necessary short wheel base for cornering. When the vehicle was going round a mountain pass and met another in the opposite direction, which ever lost the decibel war of the motor horns had to back up until the back wheels were on the edge of the chasm and the last two or three rows of passengers were poised over nothing for several hundred feet. You can imagine the way the schoolboys scrambled to get into those back seats and the thrill of hanging on to the collapsed
canvas hood while looking down over the end of the bus into the void. When I went back in 1956, things had changed little but in ’64 when we went as a family, Switzerland was much better organised and, worse luck, more sophisticated

The Costs Of Tony’s Ego

I’m talking about the overall costs, not just the cost of the farewell bonanza, which I would find hilarious, if it wasn’t for the bad taste, the arrogance, the cost to the country in conception terms and the financial costs also. I have never heard of a politician going on a farewell trip round the world, while still in office, with high responsibilities, two wars in progress, and an infrastructure in chaos. Of course, if one is no longer in office, the protocols in the visited countries will be much lower grade. I think that covers it.

For the two years after Tony Blair took office, I like a lot of people thought we were seeing a new approach to politics, which of course we were, but in our innocence, we didn’t recognise it for what it was – and then we began to. There were rumblings. in the media that the members of. the Cabinet were being overruled, even if they were actually consulted. Then we had the spin doctors, some falling from grace, the bully boys who kept the rest of the backbench toeing the line, and brow beating any public reaction to legislation. This then was followed by some of the more responsible members of the frontbench, resigning their posts. What we were finding was probably something that had always been there, the Prime Minister’s belief in his own omniscience, his incredible ego, and an insatiable desire for applause. I cannot believe that educated people, filling the ranks of the front bench, would normally have allowed so many trial legislations, or trial proposals that had to be abandoned, or subjected to a U-turn, unless their voices were totally unheard.

The high point of the ego was the desire to be aligned with Bush in a venture that on the face of it would be over in a short space of time, with the added advantage of the adulation this would produce. The fact that this was coupled with a venture into Afghanistan only aggravated a total misjudgement. In spite of warnings from cooler heads in Parliament and the Armed Forces, the war went ahead with no planning for the future, to arrive where we are today. It always amazed me that when the might of the Russian army, with its ruthless approach, failled to subdue the Cali ban in Afghanistan, how Bush and Blair believed that we would do it in short order.

I can best demonstrate the different effects change can have in different circumstances, by using design procedures. Take the design of a bridge across a navigable river. To go back to the beginning one must assume a tree crossing a stream. With time each design has been, copied, and modified to suit the circumstances of a particular location, and only rarely have bridges been so modified and so original a concept that they are virtually a new breed, as in the case for the Tacoma Straights bridge disaster. When one is faced with the design of a totally new concept, it is necessary to go through many stages of trial and error before both the design itself, and the method of construction can be relied upon to be perfect. Prior to 1946 change was relatively slow which gave time to modify products and routines in the light of experience, in the certain knowledge that those changes would not be disastrous or expensive. This approach brought us to where we were in 1939, stable, confident, and only a few with overwhelming ambition.

When the whole regime, such as local government, or nationwide ministerial control, are suddenly changed, almost overnight and something different put in its place, the loss is unimaginable. Whole properties are vacated,, new ones either built or leased, interiors are changed, new equipment and furniture purchased, and the paperwork requires new headings and a totally new filing system. Add to this the effect, the loss of history, records and valuable staff, and it is like starting from scratch. This has been happening a lot over the past 10 years. The greatest example, of course, is a Child Support Agency, which I believe was a totally new concept because different demands were being made both by those seeking restitution, and those from whom it was being sought. This was not like banking, or tax collection, it is a two-way aggravation with an ordinarily civil servant in the middle. If there was something that should have been tried on a small-scale this was it. As one who has been taken over from a job that he enjoyed, to become a civil servant, was an eye opening experience, and one I would not wish on anyone else. In the same way the U turns must have created chaos, uncertainty and confusion.

From where I sit I believe Tony Blair has little to be proud of

The Extended Family Heading For Doomsday

In re-examining some of the statements I have made in the past, I’m wondering if the nanny state is as much responsible for the loss of the extended family as a drop in the birth rate. Let me go back in history. In 1931 my whole family fell apart. There was only unemployment benefit, and as my mother had not been employed she did not qualify. With the result our family was totally split up among the members of our extended family. My brother was taken in by an uncle and aunt in a lovely home in the country, and I didn’t see him again as part of the family until the uncle died. I was taken in by a grandmother and an aunt who lived with her. My mother was employed as a housekeeper to her sister who had a flourishing business and needed one.. The only time I ever saw my mother was at weekends when the aunt in our house walked me about 3 miles on Friday nights, and back again on Sundays, and I spent a weekend with her.

In 1944 I married into a large extended family. At the time it meant nothing to me, other than a lot of faces at the wedding, Early in ’46 I received a elegram saying that my new daughter was seriously ill and I must return home. It turned out that she had developed a skin condition for which there was apparently no known cure. As the war was practically over, I was given unlimited compassionate leave. It was then that I discovered the value of the extended family. .People who had this condition died through pneumonia as the skin no longer protected the body from heat change, and the only solution was to treat the skin in a heat stable environment and hope for the best. At that time there was coal rationing and I went round our relatives and friends collecting coal to keep our daughter warm until she should survive, which thankfully she did. But this extended family functioned all the time, as I discovered once I was demobilised. For a start as the
housing conditions were non-existent, Sophie and I were taken in to the family home, where there was an invalid uncle, later an invalid grandfather as well, then an invalid aunt, and finally my own mother who was severely ill prior to her entry into a nursing home.

Today the health service, the social services and some charity organisations bear the brunt of what the average citizen had to bear in the past. What was obvious then was that the family, and even close friends took it for granted that they would help, because then they could not bear to see those they loved in dire straits. I just wonder, if the reverse is now taken for granted, that if you are in serious need the government will take over. The problem with that system is that the government has no sentimentality, and those carrying out its wishes, caring and generous as they may be, have not the same time, nor the same incentive as those members of the family had in the past. How would a little boy of nine years old get to see his mother living 3 miles away, when there was no transport available? Even today he would have to be whipped away in a car, and then there is no assurance that the people for whom the mother was working would want a little boy at weekends. By applying this logic to all the conditions I have mentioned here, you will see how impersonal the situation is today, and how much we seem to be dependent on the social services. There is no shadow of doubt that now the family’ consists of 2.4 children on average, instead of six or seven, the diminution of the extended family was inevitable, but unfortunately the social services, no matter how hard they might wish to, don’t give that level of human contact the family does, nor anything like the same stimulation. When we are young, there is so much to do and so much going on that we don’t think of the future to any great extent, and then one day we discover that we are totally dependent either on the social services, or the remnants of our family, and often the latter is scattered to the four winds. I don’t think there is a solution for this, and the sad thing about it is that the single-parent families are growing and so the extended families will disappear totally, and the end result, unfortunately, is obvious.

Pre WW”, 1930 to ’39, in order, Discipline as a Concept

I have had to exercise discipline on others, I have been the recipient of it being implemented in almost every form, from lines to a leather belt, and more than anything I have had to exercise it on myself, often unsuccessfully. I therefore believe punishment in any form is transient, and in excess is self defeating. Take a simple example of shock treatment – having, in the past, worked daily where swearing was filthy and as constant, I am no prude. I was in charge of a large team of men, rarely if ever swearing, and bad language was rarely used in my presence, not because of rules, but I assume, out of courtesy. Something was either done or said which was so criminally stupid that I swore,. The atmosphere was electric and still, and the expressions on the faces of the staff were enough to show the point had been thoroughly made. I was caned regularly in all my schools, by teachers and prefects, not for villainy, more from making fun, mild rebellion, or not suffering fools gladly. We all had to bear canning without malice or stress and accept it as the norm. Life was too absorbing to do otherwise. There were, though, sadists, especially in the teaching profession with egos out of all proportion. One primary teacher, was very keen on ‘may’ being used instead of ‘can’. When a child of nine put up his hand and asked could he go to the toilet, he went through endless torture until he used the word ‘may’ and some in extremis embarrassed themselves. The smile on the teachers face said all. One can only assume that no parental protests were made because taking the child from that school was worse for a parent than the child’s ordeal. Now, on reflection, I believe self -discipline is the nub of the problem; there is no possibility of ‘imposing’ discipline, it can only be administered by oneself, a concept which rarely seems to be taken seriously and certainly never aired in the general context of the matter. I am firmly convinced from my own experience that a beating serves only to put a temporary full stop to a situation; it introduces a feature, so violent, that what went before it is dwarfed. Beating has a minor roll, and is only valid if it is then followed by persuasion to impose self-discipline – though not in those terms. The follow-up is rarely implemented and if there is no other outlet for the energy which has engendered the anti-social behaviour in the first place, and no self-discipline to quench the fires, the punishment as such ceases to have any validity.

The Secondary School Part 2 The educational system, so hacked over today, was relatively new to secondary schools when I started, (See LCC and the Secondary School ) and the philosophy of parents doing everything to ensure their little darlings got the best education was, if anything, more prevalent then than it was in the post-war years until now, the 2000′s. When I was very small my grandmother pushed me to and from school, four times a day, a mile or more away, to ensure what I went to was considered to be the best elementary school, and later when I was able, I walked it on my own. Next, I cycled four miles or more in heavy traffic, suffering two accidents during that time on the way to school, in order to go to the best secondary school in the area. Incidentally I do not believe any legislation, outside a totalitarian state, will ever remove the desire for personal choice completely.

Discipline By The Prefects At my Secondary School, with a prefect hierarchy and the school captain at its head, they had authority to thrash, in certain circumstances – I use the word ‘thrash’ advisedly. The system was severely flawed. The original crime was insignificant, the miscreant was awarded lines to be handed to the prefect by a certain time. I was both a customer of, and part of a syndicate, which wrote lines for a fee, using a number of pencils taped together, the teachers and prefects never checked closely. Failure to hand the lines in on time doubled the dose. Failure again meant that one was called before the Prefects’ Meeting. This was a dragged-out pantomime, scripted to enhance the status of the prefects and belittle the criminal. One stood outside the library, laughter issued through the door, then there would be the serious mutter of voices and finally the door would open and the lamb would be led to the slaughter. The indicting prefect read out the charge, the School Captain asked if the transgressor had anything to say – pointless, the decision was already made, any comment would be taken as insolence, and being harangued further and even receiving extra punishment. The malefactor was then asked if he wished to be caned by the prefects, which meant the biggest and strongest one there, with a lust for blood, or have the matter referred to the Head Master, a personage on conversational terms with God, both because of his Doctorate of Divinity, but also because of his exalted position – it was really a rhetorical question. Even though one had taken the opportunity of putting on two extra pairs of gym shorts, it hurt.