Blog

  • Random Thoughts 12, A theory and a Question

    Another View on Global Warming and the Recent Flooding. I include here a theory that I postulated to my Dutch friend, Jan, and I wonder if you would agree with it or like the rest of my family realise that my brain is going to mush.

    When you think of all the conflicting changes that take place in, on the earth and in the atmosphere there must once in a while come a time when so many things are changing at once, that something most unusual will occur. I do not believe however rapid global warming has become so rapid that it could have wreaked the sort of changes that we are finding throughout the world this year. Nor do I think that this is a prelude to a total change in our atmospheric and physical conditions. Atmospheric pressure, air and earth temperatures, volcanic effects, and induced changes in the action of the sea, together with the gravitational effect of the universe, are all with us, and affecting us in different degrees. It is the degree of change in each case which we noticed over the years, but if all of these influences have their rhythms suddenly conflicting, I believe it’s possible that the condition can arise that may not be unprecedented, but could be beyond recorded information. If I am right, it does not mean that this is a one-off instance, it may be part of a build-up and die down. Most actions and reactions in nature, I believe, are on a sinusoidal basis.

    The How Did They Manage It? On UK television recently I watched fictional films of battles taking place during the Napoleonic Wars, (Sharpe), and the English Civil War, (Cromwell). In these films the battle scenes were bloody and explicit, which made me wonder how men who have been through one flight could face another. Often you see actual film footage of men going over the top at the Somme and other battlefields, and going steadily forward in a hail of machine-gun bullets.

    The enactments in these films of the Civil War and the Napoleonic Wars, illustrates the extremes of hand to hand fighting, and the sheer barbarity of war. As an ex combatant, in the Navy and the police, I am able to say from my own experience that while there were times when one had concerns, either the training or the repetition without injury, seemed to be sufficient, in my case it least not to give me any serious worry concerning my own mortality. What I find incredible though is how the soldiers in those far-off days, of pikes, cavalry sabres, short swords and muskets, were prepared to go back into battle time and again. In all soldering, in the broader sense, one is convinced that ‘it won’t happen to me!’ this is part of the answer. In the old days to some extent, the reward was in plunder, and a large part of those armies of most countries was made up of mercenaries, who had a totally different outlook on war, to conscripts, or even volunteers. I know that being part of a unit, especially one with a history of heroism and honours-gained, has a binding quality, which has to be experienced to be realised. I don’t think I am a coward, but having watched these films, I find it incredible what those people were prepared to do repeatedly. ‘Fight hard or be killed’, induces a level of adrenaline which I believe blots out reason, and induces aggression that the individual is not aware that he possesses. It is a sort of reaction, like the one you would have finding an intruder in your hall in the middle of the night.

    Here in Northern Ireland the British Army and the police, then, daily walked the streets not knowing if someone had a bead on them. As I have said before, one cannot be constantly worried about personal safety, in time the condition is taken for granted. Our men fighting our current wars are not only under the same stresses as their predecessors were, in Belfast, but they have to contend with a different terrain, different attitudes and customs and road-side, bombs. This has some of the same aspects as going over the top and facing a hail of bullets…Facing that with equanimity is to do with example, camaraderie, and pride – ‘if he can do it I can, – and it won’t happen to me anyway!’

  • Random Thoughts 11, Trolley Feminists

    Sometime ago Sophie was very ill, and I became head cook, bottle washer, and shopper extraordinaire. It was then I developed this theory. I found shopping in a supermarket so difficult, controversial and aggressive that I had to find a reason and came to the conclusion that somewhere at the back of Tesco’s was a Nissan hut, decked out like two aisles of a supermarket, for classes run by a butch feminist, for those women who felt that men had no business in supermarkets. The course would teach them aggression, hindering ploys and subtlety. Once I had evolved the theory, it was clear it was well founded. I came to the conclusion that the women were divided into three gradings, young mothers fast on their feet with a high level of aggression, matronly ladies preferably with bulk, who could emulate both a bull elephant and a drawbridge. Finally, gentle little, slightly vague white-haired great grannies of great age.

    The pears on our fruit counter are close to the top end of the aisle. I was stationed there trying to decide which pears to buy. I had one hand on the trolley which was upstream of me and close into the shelves, and in consequence my body was nearly facing the shelves. Suddenly round the corner at roughly 8 knots, came a young woman, with two children on her trolley as ballast, and hit my trolley squarely in the bows with the result the corner of the handle of mine buried itself in my rib-cage; .needless to say, no apology, just a stone-faced stare for having impeded her. At the other end of the fruit counter, where the bananas are, a lovely little old lady had quietly positioned herself and her trolley in such a way that all the bananas were all hers. She tentatively touched them, clearly looking for something that wasn’t there, took some out, examine them, and put them back, and this went on as people and me piled up on the aisle. I couldn’t help feeling she was so charmingly unaware, it must have been planned histrionics.

    In the middle of the range there is a mixture of subtlety, delicate insouciance, .and outright aggression. .There is the Slitherer. She pushes her trolley slowly along, peering at the stock, then just as you are reaching for a product, she slithers backwards and bars the way with herself and her trolley. So you advance and you are just about able to reach when she slithers forward again. That must have taken some teaching, because not only am I 6 foot plus, 15 stone, also with a trolley, but I smell of aftershave. She must have been aware of me.

    The drawbridge is a very clever technique. A robust lady will stand close to the shelving with a trolley and herself aligned. As you turn the corner of the aisle you subconsciously register that she is there and as you progress steadily up the aisle she is still there, but on approach she suddenly swings the trolley through 90? with its bow still firmly against the shelf while she stretches out across the aisle to collect something from the opposite shelf. This can take some time, so you gently give her trolley a touch with your trolley, just to show that you really do exist. You get a look which makes you amazed that you haven’t suddenly turned to a pillar of salt, and then the eyes go back to look for what she was trying to reach.

    There is also the revetment .- the protection of the produce. This can take two forms, it can consist of two people adjacent with their trolleys in a row covering some 10 feet of shelving. They are discussing some highly important matter and if you try to excuse yourself, you might just as well be on another planet. The second version is when a relative of one or other of these ladies sees them she joins them from across the aisle swerving her trolley behind her. This is a clever ploy, it not only protects the immediate products from being tampered with, it can protect half an aisle.

    There are many more ploys, and I expect local newspapers will present prizes for those people who can think up brighter and better ways of destroying a man’s shopping routine.

  • Royal Navy 1941 to ’46 in order, Life on a Small Ship

    In my time in the Navy, the people most respected as groups, were the Submariners and the Divers. Not totally because of the risk, but because the conditions of their training and work were the toughest. Subs were merely lethal weapons first and last, and the comfort of the men was well down the list of priorities. Large ships, Carriers, Battleships, Cruisers, were like floating barracks, with all that implies. Small Ships, Minesweepers, Corvettes, Frigates, and small Destroyers, of which the Hunt Class was then the latest, were unique in that the crews thought of themselves almost as a family and behaved like a family in a lot of respects.

    It used to be said that the Americans put the men in the ships and fitted the hardware round them, while the Brits did the reverse. In about ’42 the Tuscaloosa and the Wichita, two American cruisers, tied up near us in Rosythe. The Yanks, invited aboard our Hunt, could not believe our cramped conditions. When we went on their ship we understood why. They had two places to sleep, they had canteen messing with sectioned trays for eating off, and could select from a menu. We, as a mess, bought and prepared our own food, took it to the galley, where the cook put it in the oven and told us when to collect it. We were green with envy. Our system was forced on us as we had small, mixed messes, some members were watch-keepers, some were permanently on call. Hence men were eating at different times, and what they could, when they could, in periods of ‘Action Stations’. The Officers and Petty Officers had stewards or messmen to provide for them.

    It takes years to produce a warship, from the early decisions, the designs, the prototype, to the final Class, with the result that the ship in wartime is out of date even before they laid down the keel plate. Through the pressures of war with its rapidly evolving new techniques, like Asdic, Radar, men to listen to the talk between the Skippers of the German E-boats, gunnery and so on, extra space was needed, space for more men and equipment, resulting in a life of unimaginable propinquity – privacy, even for the officers was unknown. I believe that under peacetime circumstances there would have been constant friction under these conditions, but while there were minor disputes, the seriousness of our lot welded the crew as nothing else would have, come what may we were in it together, Life ashore in barracks was entirely different – every man for himself.

    I think that the experience of bad weather on a Hunt Destroyer can best be summed up by a brief descriptive piece I wrote a long, long time ago, it is called:- The Change Of The Watch  posted next.

  • Royal Navy 1941 to ’46 in order, The change of the Watch

    For four days the stunted little warship had writhed and hammered her way through the green bowels of the storm until the most hardened member found himself praying. In their selfish agony a few prayed for death, little caring its cause or how many would die in its accomplishment. Men of sterner stuff prayed for respite and peace.

    The watch-keeper descended the steep steel ladder, his glistening black oilskins stiffly standing out from his body as if shunning contact, while his smooth-heeled sea-boots skidded in the shallow, dirty water that was sloshing back and forth in the passageway, in time with the rhythm of the ship. His face, beneath four day’s growth of beard, was weathered to rawness and his fingers were pallid and stiff where they protruded from the over-long sleeves of his coat. He steadied his lurching body before the sliding door of the steel compartment that thrummed like a biscuit tin under the pounding of irritant fingers, braced himself against the fetid smell that he knew would heap nausea upon nausea and pushed back the door. A bucket hung stiffly on a rope from the deck-head, arcing to and fro like a stuttering pendulum in tempo with the buffeting hull, while an excess of heavily laden hammocks, suspended above like strung maize, mimicked the jerking pail.

    Entering this sordid home of his to waken his relief, and then to try to sleep, he cursed as he always cursed his existence, where privacy and freshness were highlights shining from the past, or beacons of the future, where the present was dull, grey and featureless, and where it could be conceivable that the stale, greasy smell of sailors’ hot cocoa could herald warmth, comfort and a change of mood.

    He shook the hammock above him and waited for the familiar wakening pattern to unfold. The grunt, the stretch, the short staccato oath and then the appearance of the grey sea-boot socks as the long legs bestraddled the hammock to be bumped alternately by the swing of the exhausted bundles on either side. While he waited for the next phase, he looked down and absentmindedly watched the articles on the Mess table skate back and forth, and with senses long since deadened felt neither surprise nor criticism as one of the stockinged feet descended to squash flat the wedge of margarine as it too tobogganed on its saucer across the table top beneath the hammocks. The face that looked down at him was bruised with exhaustion and sucked dry with fatigue.

    “God save me from looking like that!” he thought.

  • Royal Navy 1941 to ’46 in order,Fiddles,Food and tales of Chicanery

    Food was in short supply throughout the war, we were not starving in the true sense, but our diets were insufficient to maintain that layer of fat which we might have carried just before the war and by 1944 I weighed only ten and a half stone with a ribcage like a washboard. I now weigh over 15 stone. I had never experienced hunger before this. Being evacuated there was a prevalent barter system in country districts, which cushioned us against the rigours of food rationing and I suspect my parents had made sure I was well fed. When working in Westminster lunch out was probably a useful supplement, but naval life was a different thing altogether.

    My hunger started immediately I joined, and as we were badly paid, ten shillings a fortnight to start with, I had to find other sources of food. The obvious place at the Butlins camp was the kitchens, supervised by Wrens. One or two of us therefore cultivated the acquaintance of some of the Wrens with the result we all benefited. There was also a scheme there, operated by the more deft and more unscrupulous, which enabled them to improve their share to the detriment of their mates and that was the multi-fork system. It was not for tall people, short people were better at it. It was pure theft, and not worth a mere couple of sausages, especially as one could not gauge from whom one was stealing as seating was random. The system was quite logical.. We were fed in the old Butlins dining hall, on food already laid out, on trestle tables in rows, even before we were allowed into the building,. The vultures armed themselves with several forks, moved along between table and bench-seats to find a seat, and in passing, pierced a sausage from a plate with one of the forks and immediately secreted sausage and fork. This was repeated and then when the vulture sat down at his own plate he jabbed the forks, sausage and all into the underside of the table and then withdrew them one at a time to eat. It was a lot more difficult to do than describe. The injured parties would proclaim their loss and depending upon the whim of either the cooks or the supervising authority, the deficiency might be made good from the left-overs otherwise the unfortunate went without.

    In Portsmouth Barracks, the rations there were so slight that they had actually to be guarded. Each class occupied a table in the dining hall and was supplied in the evening with a day’s rations of margarine, bread, jam and sugar which was all kept in what were referred to in those days as a ‘safe’ – a cupboard, with punched, zinc grills set in wooden frames for the sides and door. The cupboards were intended to be kept somewhere cool and ‘safe’ – that is, safe from vermin as they were often kept outside the house, particularly in summer. In this case the vermin walked upright. We were so hungry, one member of the class had to sleep on the Mess table with his pillow against the door of the safe, so no one else could steal the contents; although they could disappear through the day.. I still believe that one of the reasons for the lack of food was because a highly organised Mafia spirited some of the rations out through the gate, even assuming they ever came in.

    Any barracks was set up for graft in a number of areas, and where long serving people in authority lived ‘ashore’, in the outside community, it was a racing certainty there would be shenanigans. There was the classic story of the officer in the twenties who stole the Admiral’s pinnace, a steam launch costing about half a million pounds by today’s standards. He had it loaded on a horse drawn cart and took it out through the gates, unchallenged because it had passed that way on other occasions on its way for repairs. The reason he was caught was because he had taken it up a hill which was too steep for the horses to pull.

    At the Festival of Britain in the 50’s, one of the men building the Festival Hall was stopped at the gate each night wheeling a wheelbarrow full of straw, which he claimed was bedding for his rabbits. The security man discussed the keeping of rabbits at length to relieve his boredom, and let him go. This went on for a week and then stopped. A year later the security man was in a pub when he passed the man with the rabbits and enquired after them. The latter, smiled, put down his pint and said “God Bless you mate! I wasn’t tak’n’ straw out, I was tak’n’ weelbarrers.”

  • Royal navy 1941 to ’46 in order, Chats Round the Pot-bellied Stove

    There was no dearth of extroverts in the Navy, the trick was trying to avoid them. We were a great mixture in that class going through Leydene Signal School. There were sailors who had been telegraphists and had spent years at sea and knew every dodge in the book. They would tell you that if you could play a sport, life would be a bed of roses, you would be wanted by every shore station going, especially if the sport was tennis. These men were often in their late twenties and early thirties and had seen the whole world through a porthole, a phrase which I translated to mean they were well versed in the seamier parts of every port from Malta to Melbourne, from Suez to Hong Kong. In spite of this though, most were conciliatory to us, the inexperienced HO’s. I suspect some of the tall stories we heard at night, seated drinking cocoa round the pot-bellied stoves which heated a small area of the huge hut, were apocryphal, but then again, some of the hairiest were obviously also true. Those evening discussions were fascinating. We would sit round the stove and read, study, smoke, mend socks or clothing and there was always a discussion or a monologue on some subject being carried on over peoples’ heads whether they were taking part or not.

    A class-mate, Williams say, had been a radio repair man in civilian life. He gave us an insight to his methods; something I never forgot and something which created in me a cynicism with regard to jobbing people in general, which has been repeatedly reinforced. Williams explained that before the war, broke and looking to make money, he hit on ‘The Great Idea’. Firstly he bought a tool-roll, one of those canvas or leather rolls with loops and pockets for small tools, spanners, pliers, and the like. Next he had a flier printed for pushing through letter boxes in a selected area and then sat back and waited before calling on them. The flier implied that everyone who had a car had it serviced regularly, and he included sweeping chimneys. He followed this with the suggestion that the radio was a delicate device which too should be regularly maintained. He offered to provide a service starting with a free trial. If the client was satisfied he could sign up to have the set serviced for an annual fee and from then all labour would be free for up to two visits and only the materials would have to be paid for. The prospective client would receive a visit and they could make up their mind then.

    It must be understood that radios then were in their infancy, they generally consisted of only two valves, three at the most, with huge coils or condensers for tuning. The aerials could stretch the length of the back garden and reception was very poor When the set was installed it was only a matter of hooking up to the aerial, connecting the wet and dry batteries and then one tried to tune into the only station available, the BBC, unless one could receive Luxembourg. Almost invariably people wanted to take advantage of the free service. The set was running so there should be no need to pay for replacements – something for nothing.

    Williams, when he entered a home, made a great show protecting the table, anticipating vast amounts of dust He then took the back off the radio. Standing in awe, the housewife, saw him brush out the dust and fluff.. Williams running commentary was how one could not expect the best results from something obviously so dusty. With the client’s full attention, he tuned in to the BBC and then proceeded to tune the set to the aerial, which should have been done at the time of installation but rarely was. Williams had proved his point, regular servicing was clearly needed and the client signed up and handed over a reasonable sum for the twelve month service. The client was unaware that Williams had drawn a pencil line between two terminals so that a very small current leaked from one to the other. Not enough to reduce the quality but with time it would mean that a new transformer, or some other component would be needed and he would be called out to repair the set.

    Other times Williams merely cleaned the set and left the tuning of the aerial to the next visit when he would say that a valve was on its last legs, but he just happened to have one which he would install reasonably. He would then change the valve, tune the aerial and low, the client was convinced, and delighted she had joined his happy band. The valve Williams had used had probably come out of the last set he had worked the trick on and so he was constantly being paid for a non-existent valve. There were other tricks Williams boasted of, equally heinous and sordid, but you get the gist. Little, it seems, can be taken at face value when dealing with an unscrupulous person with a specialised knowledge.

  • Royal Navy 1941 to ’46 in order, Leydene On The First Occasion.

    From the IOM we were sent to Petersfield, in Hampshire, to the Naval Signal School called Leydene. We were only to be in Leydene for about ten days and in that time we had to learn the workings of some ten transmitters and receivers together with all the ancillary equipment, so it is unsurprising that I remember nothing of that first trip, except the way we were taught. To a young man who had led a sheltered life and had been tutored mainly by Oxbridge graduates, the spiel of the three-badge Petty Officer or Chief Petty Officer, needed to be experienced and still couldn’t be believed. The three badges denoted a minimum of thirteen years service, but many of these instructors had been brought back from retirement. The classrooms were converted Nissan huts containing the replicas of the radio transmitters we would find on the ships we were destined for. Some were small, not much bigger than today’s work-top washing machine, others occupied the area of the average kitchen and were contained within an earthed steel cage, with access through a door which cut off the power to the high voltage areas when the door was opened. Almost the first thing we were taught was how to circumvent this safety measure so we could test the beast while under full power, from within its bowels, so to speak.

    Most of us, who were used to radio receivers which were only one stage advanced from the crystal set, were amazed to see a valve the size of a large vase and resistors almost a foot long. The instructors had little to worry about with respect to discipline, we were so continuously bombarded with facts and so overawed with both the equipment and the prospect that we would, within a few weeks be in sole charge of its welfare, that there was neither the time nor the energy left to mess around. It was cramming taken to a fine art. Each morning we would be marched off to a classroom where we would discover yet another set with its own peculiarities. We carried a huge loose-leaf book containing all the circuitry and hints on repair, together with our class notes and a folder of a few pages of duplicated information supplied by the instructors. This library went everywhere, even to bed, because all spare moments were filled with catching up what we’d missed or mugging up what we had forgotten. I remember one of our class was married and had permission to sleep ashore with his wife. She complained that he spent most of the night sitting up studying this huge tome.

    In class we were perched on rows of long, heavy, oak benches, with no desk and no support for the back, like starlings on telephone wires. The keen ones sat in the front row and those who were in the class purely as an alternative to sailing on the Atlantic convoys, were generally either dozing or craftily smoking on the back bench. While what I was being taught was in itself a totally remarkable experience, the method of imparting that knowledge was even more extraordinary. Inside these sets were valves, resistors, coils and condensers in the main, with a few other bits and bobs to make the whole thing work, but our elderly instructors, when pointing to a component on a circuit diagram did not refer to it by its name but merely said “Now this li ‘l f….r ‘ere is connected to that li ‘l bastard there….” and so on. In fact it became such a routine that some of us were caught more than once anticipating and saying which epithet would be applied to what item of electronic hardware and were then promptly, in our turn, referred to by yet another and even more expressive phrase.

    Indeed there was the occasion when one of the instructors was inside a transmitter ‘putting on faults’ for an exercise in fault-finding. He was mostly only breaking connections, but sometimes he would insert a faulty component. The thing was that as one became more experienced the sounds of resistors being pulled from their anchorage or valves being released were so distinctive that most of us knew which piece was being tampered with. On this occasion there was a distinctive sound and someone on the front bench named the article in a stage whisper. Suddenly a face, surmounted by a battered cap, peered over the top of the fence round the transmitter and it said “Oh no ‘e F…..in’ ain’t” and disappeared to replace the part and pull out another which was equally recognisable. For me this incident epitomised the teaching in those first months of the war.

  • Royal Navy 1941 to ’46in order, Three Weeks on the Isle Of Man

    After three months in Newcastle we left for the Isle of man where we were billeted in boarding houses on the front at Douglas. Further along the front, similarly housed but behind barbed wire, were the Italian internees, mostly harmless waiters and restaurateurs who would probably have been a greater asset to the war effort than some of us.

    Unsurprisingly, none of us realised the welcoming officer, the Entertainments Officer was John Pertwee, the actor, later to be of Dr Who and of Worsel Gummage fame. It was his job to inveigle us into contributing to the overall entertainment on the island. With a pleasant, innocent smile he enquired if we played rugby and those foolish enough to admit to it were promptly enrolled in the team and issued with navy blue kit. Later he was back recruiting volunteers for an amateur show to be put on at the local theater.

    The rooms in the boarding houses had been modified to be small ‘cabins’, the naval euphemism for a hat-box. We slept on two-tiered steel bunk beds. The ground floor was given over to a dining room and a lounge in which we were supposed to study, but in which we mostly played a gambling bastardisation of Ludo called Uckers. Each morning we were marshalled on the promenade and marched up to Douglas Head. The building there, once a hotel, was converted into a radar signal school. Radar in those days was incorrectly called RDF, or radio direction finding, as a cover for what it really did, as the Germans were understood not to have it. The originally designs were for use in aircraft and consequently small and of limited range. We were being trained on more substantial versions for use in ships as well. The theory was difficult to master in such a short time, and the distractions of being on the Isle of Man, where the war seemed so far away, didn’t help. There was a dance hall where we tried to keep up with the local girls’ terpsichorean expertise, there was poker, Uckers, and the local services canteens. Finally, of course there was Lieutenant Pertwee and his bloody rugby, and I use the term advisedly.

    He had omitted to tell us the RAF personnel stationed on the IOM had been especially selected for their rugby expertise, if they had a ‘blue’ or better still an international cap, all the better. It seemed that to retain a posting to the IOM as a member of the RAF required only one perquisite – to be an established, seventeen stone member of the rugby elite. Anything less and you could be on your way PDQ. We, the newly arrived Navy, eager to get off study, no matter the excuse, uninitiated into the mores of our sister service, – we thought of them as sissies – ran out onto the field of carnage with a light heart. I remember very little of the game except as it applied to me. I was not, I fear, seventeen stone, I was barely ten and a half, and this was a vital statistic. I don’t think we, as a team, were doing too well. There was one bloke on the other side whom I’m sure was referred to in terms unfit to be repeated. He was an oft capped international, was easily heavier than three of us put together, and belligerent with it. At one point in the game he picked up the ball, practically on his own line and started lumbering straight down the field. He had managed to evade a number of those late tackles the coaches take exception to, the ones where the tackler hits the ground gently, but only after the runner is well past. Mistakenly I thought that I was made of sterner stuff. I knew how the job should be done, and proceeded to demonstrate – silly me! I tackled him around the knees, head on – literally. About three minutes later, when I was brought round, I heard that I had not even caused him to stutter in his lope for the posts and a score, I had made no impact in any way, I was as a mere gnat, I was also unconscious. My first and only brush with first class rugby had been ignominious and salutary. It reinforced the laws of the lower deck, ‘never volunteer and always plead ignorance’, and to think how gentlemanly and simple the game was then, fifty years ago, today I would be dead

  • Sunday Special, The Constituents of Family Glue

    I hear so often today of break-ups of relationships that I started questioning in my own mind why such a high proportion seem to fail. I am not trying to preach, nor criticise, just analyse what it takes for one-time total strangers, with different aspirations, different backgrounds, even different customs in some cases, to choose to live together in the most intimate of ways, and what it takes to hold them together.

    My credentials for the analysis are twofold; when I was eight years of age my parents separated and I never saw my father again. Today I have been married for almost 63 years, with a burgeoning family of great-grandchildren. Most people are aware, especially those that have experienced it, that the break-up of families has long-term repercussions inducing loneliness, insecurity, a loss of self-confidence, and in some, not all, an aggressive outlook. An examination of the glue which holds some families together successfully would seem therefore to be worthwhile. It is expensive in self-control, understanding, courtesy and consideration of others, and requires a good deal of unselfishness. Within a short time most of these attributes become routine, but as each is as essential as the other, and many I have not enumerated, at times it can be like crossing a stream with small steppingstones set at long intervals. It is then that you need the long view, the wide perspective, and mutually cool heads.

    Fortunately those first months of marriage, or association, are so heady, such fun and without need for restrictions, that the process of melding, easing the rough corners, teaching and learning subconsciously, grows without notice. This is the period of building a nest, which, like in nature, is psychologically necessary because not only is it fun, one begins to find more and more about each other, their tastes, their likes and dislikes, their attitude to money and relationships outside the immediate family. This is all part of building up the glue, providing the memories, and looking forward to the aspirations. Some children of wealthy families are denied this experience because the nest has been bought and provided for them, including the car and holidays in the country seat. I believe, sincerely, that having to overcome paucity of cash, perhaps accommodation problems, and all the other pinpricks which are part of creating a family, are the strongest part of the glue. That is when one learns self-control, understanding, and consideration. Without these, friction is inevitable and that is a solvent that destroys the glue.

    Part of the understanding and consideration is to sieve outside influences, some of which can be corrosive, to assess the true value, and the effect they might have on the relationship within the family. These influences often come from the wider family. Nothing in this world, even the world itself, maintains a steady and placid progress, so family life will have its ups and downs. These will test the strength of character of the participants who must learn as they live. The advent of children to most of us is the second part of the glue, those early years when every day is a revelation have as much or more to do with the binding of a family than any other aspect. It is therefore essential that young parents can devote a lot of their time to bringing up their children, for the sake of the children and for the creation of the glue. Love, family love, is the super-glue. Generating super-glue takes time and patience, and is well worth the effort.

  • Random Thoughts 10, MRSA and Jail

    Recently a very old friend was in hospital for a period and during that time she developed, on three occasions, MRSA or some other awful, unpronounceable, disease expressed in letters. One reads about these cases in the press, and it is only when someone you know is infected that you realise the size of the problem and the fact that it is on your doorstep. We, the old ones, are always bleating on about the hospitals of our day, the inflexible rigidity of the discipline meted out by the matrons, and the quality of service that we received. Of course in those days there was no penicillin, the cure-all that is now blamed for these new diseases so virulent that they have the ability to mutate and defeat the penicillin that spawned them.

    Recently the number of people incarcerated in jail has risen to an unprecedented level, and this fact led me to wonder why, with so much humanity in close proximity, there were not outbreaks in jails of diseases similar to our MRSA. It is not that I wish them on our prisoners, merely that I wonder how or why it has been avoided. Is a lesson to be learned here?

    I know about scrubbing floors, I have scrubbed many in my day, and I know I’m totally out of date when it comes to cleaning-machines. My mother was a cleanliness freak, we lived by carbolic soap and scrubbing brushes. So the other day when I saw on television an article about MRSA and hospital cleanliness, they were showing a cleaner swishing a very large, soft mop-type device that my mother would have condemned. She objected strongly to the use of those mops made of linen and a bit like dreadlocks, she said they never cleaned completely, they only moved the dirt and germs elsewhere. I just mention this in passing.

    If reports in the press are to be believed, when the uninitiated go to prison there are other ills that they are open to, drugs and a criminal education. If the present prison population has risen to such an incredible extent, and presupposing that the ills referred to above are indeed as serious as expressed, this would raise two questions. The first is why the insouciant has to be lumped with the recidivist; and secondly, why has the breakdown of society increased to such an extent, without having been tackled, so we are now arriving at a point where it is clearly out of control?

    I believe that the fear of prison is so mild as to place no restraint on those perpetrating the crimes we are hearing about, such as stabbings, gang warfare, house incursion with brutality, shoplifting and protection rackets. The cost .to the country of criminality, coupled with the penal system, must be crippling. One of the reasons of course is obvious, as I’ve said previously, it is lack of respect for others, for authority, mainly brought about, I believe, by lack of parental control in the early years. It is time that the parents were forced to take the responsibility for the the crimes of their children, at least up to the age of 16, and have to pay a penalty accordingly. Crime will never be eradicated, obviously, but the eradication of entry into crime must be a national priority. First-time offenders should be segregated, and care taken, as I believe it already is, to ensure that the penalty fits the crime, and that rehabilitation is a priority.

    Sight and Convenience. Pre-WW2 large conurbations poorly served by public transport and without shops, did not exist. There were villages, towns and cities, with shops and markets within walking distance that satisfied the everyday needs of most. A few years ago we moved house to an area where the nearest shops are about a mile or more away, and they only provide essentials as they see them, and there is no localised competition. This situation has arisen of course, because everyone has access to a car. Recently I discovered that my sight had diminished to the extent that my vision was less than required by law as a driver, and now I am dependent upon others. I still use phrases like ,I must take you.’ or ‘tomorrow I have to go.’and then I realise that I will not be taking or going as an individual, but being taken, which places me in a situation where I am dependent, and I don’t like it.

    With all this publicity of saving fossil fuels, the carbon footprints, and all the other heinous ways in which we are damaging the environment, I can envisage a time when the motor car will become unpopular, especially for two-car families, with the result that hundreds of thousands of houses will be stranded, shop-less and dependent upon public transport, and if it is as complicated, or as impossible as it is where I live, to get from A to B, God help ’em.