Blog

  • Stress In Millennium 2

    Being retired with a relatively new, small house, and few responsibilities. I have time for things I never had time for in the recent past, and which so many people don’t seem to have time for today. No! Not flying of to a Costa, just sitting in a deck chair and crowd-watching, reading, walking for a purpose – to look and see and admire nature, not charging along daily, round the houses, to keep fit.

    Before WW2 few people as a percentage owned their own house. The smaller properties were rented on a weekly or monthly basis, and the larger were leased, on 99 or 999 year leases. Families lived in the one house for generations. Today there is little rented property and people move about four times during adulthood, resulting in the second and third purchases being progressively dearer. In the 30s and after WW2, we, in our early years, had security, no pension worries, no fear of redundancy. Life was so much slower, you can’t envisage just how slow.. with no electronic communication; few even had a telephone, so questions of any sort were either verbal or written; thus giving time for thought, to mull, to make a decision and then change it, if necessary, before an answer was needed., not ‘knee jerk reaction’, a 21st centaury complaint. This applied particularly in business dealing and politics.

    Most were in a stable environment, could predict what we would be doing this day next year. There was little peer pressure, because there was no rat race. Salaries changed little, year by year, and taxation was stable. Most of us followed in our fathers footsteps, if a tradesman, it was apprenticeship, Journeyman and a chance at Foreman. In the professions the route was mainly through written exams such as City and Guilds, or institution exams, mugged up for by correspondence course, not university, Development in design was slow, and mainly for the wealthy. One bought an article and if some part of it wore out one could replace it from a local shop. In Belfast, this state of affairs lingered until the Troubles, when the IRA blew up a shop and warehouse of long standing and we lost valuable spares, and ever since we have joined the throw-away society How that helped the cause I fail to see. There were door to door collections for insurance and the HSA, Hospital Saving Association. The doctor’s fee was seven shillings and sixpence, when the weekly wage was between 33 and £5 a week.

    Advertising was not honed to the insidious level it is today. The placards and news paper ads were cosy pictures with banal messages, not warnings of doom and disease if the product was not bought and used. There was little pressure selling, Radio Luxembourg did not transmit until the mid to late 30s, ‘Auntie’, the BBC, had a clear field untrammelled by commerce. The working classes generally hated being in debt, there was a stigma attached to being insolvent, and pawning, while frowned upon, was for some families a regular ritual, popped on Monday, redeemed on payday, and the window of the pawnbroker’s shop held a fascination for most, especially children. There was stress, but nothing like today. With just news papers and the radio programmes, which had a censorship code, we were not clued up as people are now, we had taboos, we didn’t openly discuss things which were not ‘nice’, we were not faced with murder on the doorstep daily, or exhortations on health. The generally low level of wages, coupled with the fact that we walked so much, kept us healthy, eating good wholesome food, with little that was pre-prepared or likely to cause obesity. .We were without the stresses of driving, public transport took the strain, and with so little money, and the fact that furniture was handed down from generation to generation, so well made it could stand the test of time, shopping had not the significance it has today, when it has become a regular family outing. If iin difficulties we could call on relatives who lived close by, and families tended to remain in the same locality for generations, rather than being scattered as they are today.

    Am I wrong to consider much of the stress today is self-inflicted? That affluence has spawned a desire for acquisition, self betterment at any cost, peer pressure, permanently sailing close to the wind, making life a race, with no let up, and no time to take the long view. Too much emphasis placed upon nonessentials, such as status and conforming It is difficult enough to maintain one house, let alone two, and some have even three, the maintenance must be stressful. Possessions induce stress, and pride can often induce acquisition out of proportion to need. We in the 20s and 30s had such a limited horizon, due to our financial situation, that we led a simple, relatively stressless existence. Surprisingly it was not dull or boring, but our pleasures were possibly more simple and cheaper.

  • A Serious Warning, Flooding.

    Northern Ireland’s First Minister had Question Time. Firstly the questions had to be submitted days in advance, and answering the question was less important than unrelated views and policies. This meeting coincided with a deluge providing the worst flooding we have seen in Northern Ireland for a considerable time. The Minister for Development made a statement as to why the conditions were as bad as they were. It was clear that he had not done his homework as he constantly referred to The Water Service as the Water Company. One would have expected better, as the Water Service replaced the Company in 1973.

    A VERY SERIOUS WARNING TO THE UK. Aspects of Drainage the Populace should know. This is a UK matter, not one confined purely to Northern Ireland.
    Flooding was inevitable through the demand to increase housing, and the fact that gardens and driveways have been paved over. We should not be surprised, if the outcome is flooding, – although everybody seems surprised.

    I have no wish to be boring, so I will try to explain simply how this has come about, and how those responsible for maintaining the drainage, had not and have not a hope in hell of keeping up with progress. To demonstrate the problems the drainage engineers have to face I will use the analogy of the tree. Consider the trunk of a tree, the branches and twigs, starting small and year on year growing taller, the trunk gets thicker and so do the branches as they extend. The drainage of a city started when it was possibly a small village and while the configuration of the pipes of the sewer is like a tree, as time progresses with the city getting bigger the sewers have to be relaid or duplicated; this creates drainage problems, disruption, inconvenience and controversy. House extensions, including conservatories have aggravated the conditions. It is therefore obvious that some trunk sewers will inevitably lag behind the progress of the city. This is a prescription for flooding.

    In Victorian times surface water and sewerage were combined, and constructions called storm overflows were later inserted, so that in heavy rainfall the surplus water overflowed into a storm drain and ultimately into the rivers or sea. Unfortunately some of those systems are still in place or being got rid of as fast as possible, but much of the old housing built before the 60s is probably still on a combined system. Engineers designing drainage used to use parameters based upon decades of experience and records, designing in the past for a storm arriving once in a century. Rain falling on hard surfaces has a very fast run off, the rate determined by the gradients. Rain falling on cultivated areas is first of all absorbed and then with saturation, run-off is slow due to the nature of the ground and what is growing there. This is what the minister should have been explaining, especially that no one could have anticipated the rate of rainfall experienced.

    Some years ago there was severe flooding in the south of England caused by heavy rainfall and the failure of river revetments. This was not an isolated case and caused me to examine the possibility of designing attachments to the access doors of properties that could be quickly erected by even the most infirm, to hold out the floodwaters. This was possible, however, it didn’t prevent water and sewerage backing up into the house through the toilets and the ventilators.

    Water does not flow uphill, but it can be driven uphill by pumps. Totally improving the drainage system of the whole country in areas likely to flooding from downpours similar to those encountered this June, 2007, will never be eradicated using simple drainage methods, it is too vast a problem, especially with global warming, and also rising tidal levels. Pumping in low-lying areas may be the only solution. One of the problems presented with this solution is the plethora of underground piping, cabling, and culverts, that will make this work both difficult and very expensive.

    It is therefore possible to appreciate not only the problems to be faced, the urgency of viable solutions, the vastness of the problem, but the timescale and the incredible costs for remedies. The latest intensity of flooding shows that new areas are now vulnerable. I believe the solution lies in segregating areas so that the aggregation of run-off is reduced, with the excess water from these areas being pumped when the rate of flow requires it, to other secure systems of trunk sewers and storm drains. Floodplain problems require different solutions.

  • WW2,1940 to ’41, in order, Cluttons, Part 1 of 3

    I’ll describe the marvellous institution of Cluttons of 1940 in detail elsewhere, but refer to it here to set the scene of the Westminster Home Guard. Someone misguidedly told me that going to university during the war was a waste of time, with evacuation the degree would be worthless and I would probably be called up halfway through the course. WRONGGGG!! But the decision was made and I was articled as a Valuation Surveyor to Cluttons. – the most august Surveyors in Britain, The building, near the Victoria Tower at Westminster, of redbrick and cream sandstone, is at least 150 years old. That first day is impossible to describe – the transformation from the schoolboy to the worker The building itself had a faint aroma of polish and leather bindings, not unpleasant, which imparted a feeling of familiarity. There was a little self-contained flat at the top of the building, where ‘Skipper’, the Janitor lived with his wife. Skipper was ex- regular army. His additional duty was to train the section of Home Guard which had been formed from members of staff and a few from other offices. Sam Clutton, a Partner, was the officer in charge and actually had converted a Rolls Royce into a troop carrier, for us, his little band of followers. We paraded in the basement like ‘Dad’s Army’, had bayonet practice and the sergeant’s description, instructions and logistics were so bloody and graphical, I opted for the Navy on the spot. In the office basement Skipper had erected a firing range and had fitted some 1914/18 0.303 rifles with Morse tubes so we could fire 0.22 ammunition. The basement ran some considerable distance under the building so we were able to lie, kneel, stand and fire at targets which were stationary and moving. Apart from the odd exercise, the visit to see the Northover Projector and standing guard on Buckingham Palace our duties were mainly to swell the numbers of the Grenadier Guards in blockhouses round Westminster.

    THE VERY ODD HOME GUARD EXERCISE
    Our office platoon, of the Westminster Battalion, had to perform exercises, which could take place in parks, on Wimbledon Common, anywhere. Of them all this was the oddest. They generally consisted of creeping about in an ill-fitting uniform with an empty rifle, drinking tea at an all night stall with big wedges of sandwiches and /or a pink and white coconut cake to fill the corners, and riding in the back of the Rolls. However, one night we were told we were going to enter into an ‘exercise’ with another HG unit from, I believe, Transport House. The idea was we would be the invading army and were to attack HQ, which was to be Transport House, while they, the enemy defending Transport House, would stop us. I used to play games like that when I was in short trousers I forget the details but several things stand out clearly; there were no ground rules laid down about how the sortie was to be carried out, we were formed into groups of about four and sent out to follow different routes. We set off. Half way between our office and theirs, standing in the centre of a square, was a church that had recently been severely bombed. My mate and I, with a couple of others, started walking towards our objective and it soon dawned on us that there was absolutely no hope of passing undetected in those streets unless one could hide. There were a few buildings with steps leading down to a basement entrance, but they were traps for sure. Then we saw the church. Immediately we realised that if we could climb into the half-torn bell-tower and stay there undetected, the defenders would pass us by, which is exactly what happened, although our perches were precarious, to say the least, and today the Health and Safety Act would preclude soldiers from being allowed to take cover like that for merely a practice, We duly arrived at our goal and said that we had captured it. This was obvious as there was only one man there manning a telephone, and there were four of us. When we retired to the basement of our office we felt pretty satisfied with our evening’s work.

    During the following week all hell broke loose. We thought we were going to be praised for initiative and inventiveness, instead we were castigated by the powers-that-were for not playing to rules they had thought up after we had beaten the enemy, though not by Sir, who agreed that we were right. The British Military seem to be totally crazy and have strange ideas about war. I sometime wonder if it has dawned on them even now, as it seems to have done on most other nations, that the idea is to kill the other side by any means at all and not get our own chaps killed at all – after all dead is dead. I often think they have always had it the other way round – ‘it’s not cricket, old man, to hide in a church.

  • WW2, 1940 to 41, in order, Stratagems

    The LDV, Railings And Carrots. This is the first in a series about The LDV, Home Guard and London 1940

    ‘Stratagems’ Chambers Dictionary, offers terms to apply to Government chicanery, most of them apply at times of crisis, and never more than in 1940, when the LDV, the Local Defence Volunteers, was inaugurated. I believe it was a moral booster, a “We are all in this together” type shot in the arm, a distraction from the parlous state we were in at the time of the Evacuation of Dunkirk. I am also certain it also applied to the Home Guard. They were cynical acts of people who knew the futility of it all.

    Fifteen years old, evacuated to a little village nestling in the South Downs, just behind Brighton, I joined the LDV as a dispatch rider, with a ten year old second-hand bike. I hadn’t a clue where I was to ride to, and we never had a message anyway. It is absolutely true to say, we were apprehensive, and convinced we would be looking down the barrel of a Luger, any day soon. All the silly stories of one rifle among ten, pitchforks, and ten-gauge shotguns are absolutely true to the letter. Night after night, some of us were always up on the Downs in the dark, with our greenish grey arm band which was totally invisible, standing looking South, discussing anything but the hordes of paratroopers we were looking for. The most surprising thing about this pantomime was that we couldn’t see just how ridiculous it all was, and I’m convinced this was because we were all itching to get into the fray, schoolboys, shopkeepers and pensioners, and this was our only route.

    The next insanity was ripping up iron railings to melt down for munitions. Throughout the country railing of all shapes and sizes were commandeered in the most ruthless manner, leaving amputated stubs sticking out of concrete and hand carved stone alike. Some of the most beautiful and precious wrought iron was sacrificed in this ill-gotten theft. It was theft because at the end of the war it was still lying in yards and some was reclaimed and re-erected. But they didn’t stop there; a plea to patriotism went out for copper and brass. My evacuation hostess was a fanatical patriot who asked me to smash up priceless brass ornaments and put a pick through the most beautiful brass pans and trays, to make them un-saleable. Some could not be damaged seriously. I unsuccessfully pleaded with her saying it would all be diverted, and at the end of the war I was proven right, it began to reappear, up and down the country in small amounts at a time..

    A few years later in the War it was put about that night fighter pilots were fed carrots to improve their sight – carrotin can marginally affect eyesight – I believe the idea was to boost carrots as a food at a time when vegetables were in short supply. I think it worked, people were actually talking about it seriously. They are still at it – governments – the old conjuring trick – provide a diversion and you can get away with anything – one must think most critically.

  • WW2, 1939 to ’40, in order, Evacuation Part 2

    Lewes – A Place Apart In retrospect there was something almost magical about the months I spent there. I was not aware of this at the time, I was often unhappy, but who is sublimely happy all the time, contrast gives colour. Lewes, the Town, was the hub, but it was really the district which was wonderfully anachronistic, such a revelation to the Town boy, contrasting to all he knew yet a living encapsulation of all he had read in novels, heard on the radio and imagined – it was pure Noel Coward and Ivor Novello

    Incorporated into Lewes Grammar we resumed our education,. I was billeted in a village nestling against the South Downs in the Ouse Valley with a married couple, the Baileys. At first I didn’t like the idea of cycling 3 miles each way, every day, but later I realised I had been presented with a unique experience, one I would never have had if I had been billeted in the town. The village, just a collection of houses bordering the main street, itself a cul-de-sac, culminated in a path leading up into the Downs. There was a church hall for whist drives, the annual Christmas festival, the local drama group, in time the LDV; in fact, everything a village hall is expected to sustain. Opposite was the post office cum village shop, the hub of village gossip. In warm weather the village street acted as a funnel. Sitting high up on the hill studying, I found I could hear a conversation taking place below. Understanding what was said, I looked round and the only people in sight were women, half a mile below me, talking at the gate of the post office – they were gossiping. When they stopped and left, the sound stopped.

    The Charm Of The Ouse Valley. On a map of the area between Lewes and Newhaven, you will see the Ouse valley with such lovely village names as North Ease, South Ease, Rodmel, and on the other side, Glynde with Glyndebourne. In 1939-40 it was an area given over to agriculture. There was a poet called Pound, who lived in Rodmel. Not Ezra Pound, but a local focus of interest. He had named all his children with Christian names beginning with ‘P’, so everyone opened the mail. This was typical of eccentricities I found in the Ouse Valley. There were marked social differences in the Valley. There were the farm labourers, maids and their families. Then there were the traders, the post mistress and shopkeepers in Lewes and also some of the farmers. Then there were the professional classes, the Baileys fell into this category, maybe the vicar, next came the gentlemen farmers, the inherited wealth and finally the dignitaries such as the MP and the squire. By association I was part of the professional group, but though I was never truly comfortable, I learned much through socialising. The general air of the whole area was ‘County’ with a capital ‘C’. In our own village was the local Squire. Whether he really was, I never knew, but with the name of Sir Amhurst Selby-Bigg he had every right to be. He and his wife would give out prizes at do’s and in the summer he generously threw his personal tennis court open to the village and we had tournaments there with breaks for Robinson’s Barley Water. There were wealthy farmers who were sociable and as we went to school with their children we had an ‘in’ to the higher echelons of farm life. We went to market with them, helped with the harvest and generally mucked in, but these were not the farmers we had helped prior to coming to Lewes, these were ‘gentlemen farmers’.

    The winter of ’39-’40 was particularly severe, to the extent that when cycling to school the only way of turning the corner at the bottom of a particularly steep hill was to ride straight into a six foot high drift, extract oneself and then head off on the next leg. Later there was a sudden thaw followed by an equally quick freeze which left the roads coated in about an inch of ice. We evacuees made slides and the locals had ice skates and were to be seen pirouetting and twirling past us. We slowly integrated.

    Even though the war had gone badly and there was the threat of invasionb hanging over us, one cannot live in a state of frightened paralysis. Slowly our lives became normal as we entered into a routine and with the routine, helped by the friendship of the people of the Valley, came a wonderful period of my life which was totally foreign to what I had known before. While I was rubbing shoulders with the English class system at its most rigid, what I found there probably knocked any snobbery I might have had out of my outlook for all time. I think I must have seen it for what it was and eschewed it because instinctively, from a social aspect, I became classless.

  • WW2, 1939 to ’40. in order, Evacuation Part 1

    Encyclopaedia, make no mention of Evacuation, which affected 5 million children, in June ’39, disrupted families whose children were dragged off into the depths of the country, but also the poor devils who had to look after them. Evacuation is a sort of two way mirror, showing each group how the other lived. Not all of us were small with labels tied to our lapels, some were in their last year at school and had to go because the school went. In Sussex I lived in four different homes, three far outside my own experience. We were taken to a Sussex village, assembled in the church hall where we camped out until fixed up with digs. My first home was in a children’s orphanage where I was very happy helping the older children look after the little ones, but that was only temporary until an ordinary billet was found. Next I joined the Assistant Headmaster and his wife at the home of a senior member of the Stock Exchange and life really did change. The house, was mock-Tudor, standing in vast grounds, with a ‘shoot’ attached. The owner, Tate, had the sort of life-style common today, but one I had only seen at the cinema. It was a two car family, with a gardener-chauffeur and live-in maid. We dined off polished mahogany with lace mats, silver of the highest quality, each with his own napkin-ring and linen napkin. Brought up to protect the wood of our dining table under all circumstances, passing glasses, salt cellars and dishes, one to another on this highly polished surface, was like scraping an open wound but I soon acclimatised and decided I liked the life. I was treated as one of the family, but I had to earn my place by helping the maid, cleaning the car when the chauffeur was off and acting as a sort of gilly when Tate went shooting in his private shoot, which was a fair size. We hunted pheasant, partridge, rabbit and hare I was beater, gun carrier, and clack when Tate managed to hit anything, which was not too often. In search for rabbit, Tate saw one; I saw a flutter of grasses and suggested he shoot between the rabbit and the grasses, which he did and killed three rabbits. At length he explained to me how he did it – several times, never once mentioning my part in the operation. He told the tale to everyone in the house, including the maid, finally telephoning all his friends with news of the carnage. Generally, however, he was a poor shot and maimed more than he killed, with the result I mostly had to dispatch the poor things.

    We were evacuated prior to when Chamberlain was doing his diplomacy and the rest of us waited with baited breath. I remember the day war was declared, it was a beautiful sunny day in August, we listened to the fateful words spoken on the radio and then, those like the Assistant Head and Tate, who had seen it all before, looked meaningfully at one another and no one spoke for a while. On an errand for Mrs Tate, emptying the cigarette machines in the district of cigarettes – she expected the cost of tobacco to rocket – I heard air raid sirens for the first time, it was eerie, but an air raid in that beautiful countryside on that beautiful day was really unimaginable. I was in matriculation year – working in Tate’s house under the eye of the Assistant Headmaster’s wife, it was like a correspondence course because there was nowhere the senior boys could be accommodated. We met occasionally but most of our work was done individually, with the consequent drop in standards. Those days would have formed the summer break under normal circumstances, so when it was time to resume schooling in the proper environment we were all shunted off once again to join the locals in a grammar school. I finished up in Lewes, a lovely part of East Sussex, for a period of my life I’m glad I did not miss.

    The Incident Of The Adder I was almost totally a town boy. I loved the country and found pleasure in walking through the shoot and across the fields. This day I came across a short grass snake, it was light fawn and dark brown with markings in a ‘V’ pattern on its head. Twelve to fifteen inches long it looked positively beautiful and I could not resist it. Apart from those I had seen in Africa I had only seen snakes in glass cases at the Zoo. I picked it up and stroked its head and back and after a while put it in my jacket pocket. In successfully frightening the maid with it, I decided to put the grass snake up my sleeve, and then reaching for the salt; the snake would glide down my arm, slither across the shiny mahogany – Surprise!! The grass snake had other ideas. Firstly it mysteriously transformed itself into an adder, next, bored with games, it bit me in the thumb and finally it poisoned me. It must have been a Sunday because Tate was at home. When he saw the snake he realised it was an adder and promptly killed it. Next he telephoned the local doctor, some 5 miles away and then drove me to him at speed. By the time I arrived a lump had formed in the lymph gland under my arm and even though he gave me an antidote I could not use my arm for days after that – serve me right for my ignorance.

  • Pre WW2, 1930 to ’39, in order, Sensitivity

    Looking back to all those years from the late 20s until probably the 50s, I can’t believe how insensitive we were to the feelings of others, when we were happily living in our little bubble which was Briton. Today, young people would find it difficult to imagine a Britain where, apart from the docks, or the centre of capital cities, one rarely saw a foreigner of any sort. This was Briton pre-WW2. Living in Africa under the British Raj, I unquestioningly absorbed its attributes. During the War I met African Americans on an American warship tied up near mine, and later in Belfast as part of the Second Front. That was about it.

    So, the first time I encountered the sensitivity of the ‘coloured races’ was in about 1950 when at afternoon tea in Belfast, I met a student from the Indian Sub-Continent. We were talking generally and I referred to our servants in Africa as ‘boys’. At that point the calm afternoon was disrupted irrevocably. In Livingstone, Northern Rhodesia, now Maramba, Zambia, we had servants who lived in a collection of mud and reed huts at the bottom of our back garden. Up until the tea party I had taken the situation in Africa as the norm, it was our way of life, and everyone of us, Brits, referred to the staff as ‘boys’, and accepted the arrangement without thought.

    This simple teatime opened a can of worms which has bothered me ever since. Forever, dignitaries of every creed and colour, together with empires generally and the British Colonial Empire in particular, have been, and it seems, still are, effecting changes in world harmony. The religious orders for whatever reason disrupted irredeemably the way of life in countless countries and it seems still are. The Brits tried to build a little Esher in every part of the world they ‘colonised’, without regard to the effects on the local cultures. It is no wonder that indigenous members of the Empire resent our past. One aspect of those early days, was the legacy of the Victorian music halls which we took for granted, enjoyed and were amused by, but we never really questioned the basic root, nor the possibility it could give offence, I refer to the Black and White Minstrel Show, and especially the gollywog. What house in the 30s had no gollywog in some form or other, even if it was only a label on a jar?

    Partly through the class war within our own society, where now, menial jobs are hard to fill, we are now being invaded ourselves, and our legislation is being altered to take account of the ‘sensitivities’ of the invaders as we steadily move to a fully multi-racial society; but not without some reciprocal resentment. As if to somehow redress the balance, there are those, who can afford to, who are now invading Europe and other Continents, to buy a second home abroad, a holiday home, or are seeking an investment for their old age, Just a thought – will global warming have a deleterious affect on the success of these ventures, as their purchases will have on the young people on the housing ladder on those continents?

  • Obscene Wages and Insurance

    The Wages Today. I start with a disclaimer. Some of my family think I’m in my dotage. so take what I have to say with a pinch of salt. Donkey’s years ago when the lottery first started, arrogantly thinking I might win, I created a consortium to ensure that the family shared my luck, and the government failed to, I tried to assess what was the maximum amount of money I could possibly need, and came to the conclusion I couldn’t spend,(not waste),more than £500,000. Some of the family thought they could handle a million, but when put to it they were spending for spending’s sake. So I wonder why these footballers, entertainers and film actors are being paid such obscene amounts, millions a year, when they have no hope of ever being able or spend it, while those paying them with their bums on seats in the terraces and the cinemas, are in many cases being taken to the cleaners. Those in charge, or acting as agents have some responsibility, because they are on a percentage. When youngsters start out on a football career their main interest is in getting picked for a team, and I believe that while some of them have ambitions of avarice, the majority have come from a background where a few thousand is a fortune, and their sights are set on their own accomplishments rather than greed. Surely it is time that those on the terraces brought the major clubs to heel, because they are draining the minor leagues and not really giving value for money If you want to gauge how the average person feels about money in thousands, watch that slick, TV programme, Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. Recently there were three contestants who had arrived at £8000, with no safety net, but two were pretty sure of the answer which would give them £16,000. A sure £8000 meant so much, none went on, but two would have won the higher amount. These people were not poor, but they were not prepared to lose what they had gained. The staggering discrepancy between what these people valued and what some others believe they themselves are worth, and apparently are right to do so, is extraordinary, and defeats common sense, because the money the latter earn, at the cost of many who can’t afford the entrance fees, could not all be used, merely stored in some form. I am aware that some of these high earners perform and support charitable works, but so do people who contributed to their extortionate salaries.

    Insurance It was thinking about insurance that directed my mind to the extortionate salaries being given in certain circumstances. I have recently been ripped off by an insurance company, using specious logic to disclaim my request. I have a daughter who carries a lot of her own insurance. This gave me an idea, that perhaps we could all take out our major insurance – for serious house damage, and third party liability, then for the rest, as a family, collectively carry our own insurance for the cars, the contents, minor house damage and anything else you care to think of.

    I started looking back over my 60 odd years of property ownership and driving, and realised that what with preserving no-claims bonuses, I had made very few claims against insurance. In fact if I had carried my own insurance for all but the very serious damage to the house, and third-party liability, I would have a nice nest egg. Currently an awful lot of the companies that you think you’re insured with are in fact part of a group where the head company objects to paying claims. I wondered if these wealthy footballers and film stars have their money stashed away all over the place, and could consider acting as insurers for the serious damage to premises and third-party. How many houses do you know of where there has been serious damage? True, with climate change, whirlwinds (I nearly said twisters but that might have been misconstrued) and the like might become more prevalent but even then, as house insurance is a necessity demanded by mortgage lenders, it looks to me that this would be a sound investment, and enable the man in the street to get from under the insurance burden he is suffering today. I may be wrong, but I suspect insurers don’t compartmentalise their liabilities, they are lumped together, so when a disaster occurs somewhere in the world, say the sinking of the Titanic, the payout is partially coming from our premiums. – just a thought, it’s a form of bookmaking after all, just at a more polite level, and bookies lay off when the heat is on.

    Insurance, which is based on fear, has really gone crazy, the other day I bought a tin opener for only a few quid and I was asked if I wanted to ensure it, for an additional 20%. Some commerce today is now based on implied fear. One only has to read the ads on television to see how insidious it is, especially if you don’t have a scientific background. We are pleaded to buy bottles and tablets of this and that to ensure that we don’t catch some unmentioned and unmentionable disease

  • Random Thoughts No. 6

    School reports. A grandfather proudly showed me the reports of his 7 year old grandson .I hadn’t the heart to tell him what I really thought. It was divided into 19 separate categories with type-written reports in each category, the smallest, music, was 19 words long, the longest was roughly 42 words, and the average, about 30 words. Forgive me for being sceptical that these comments are as detailed an assessment as they appear. Two ex-teachers thought it was difficult to assess children of that age in any great degree. I don’t blame the schools, I blame the system which dictates targets, information and a host of other requirements not related to the teaching of the children. Assuming there are 30 children in the class, and these comment categories are required for each child, the teacher, or teachers, have to compose and write out, or dictate, 570 items in 17,000 words. This stretches my credibility, I just don’t believe it. What I suspect is that the teachers have standard phrases on a computer, and by tapping single codes these can be coupled together and put into the categories. The question that presents itself then, is whether this flowery language and extreme detail is truly representative. It doesn’t surprise me that a lot of schools and educational levels have gone down, because the teachers are wasting their time with this type of window dressing. In my day the teacher’s comments were handwritten and generally said something like ‘has the ability but could do better, ‘excellent’, or some other sparse comment. Then they used an alphabetical code which soon told the parents the child’s ability when read along with a pithy summary. The amount of work needed for this report, even assuming the computerisation, would have burdened either a teacher, or a combination of a teacher and a backroom staff, excessively. The teachers I spoke to are glad they are not teaching today

    Bush really frightens me, has me waking up at night with the screaming hab-dabs. I have known ever since World War II, what I knew in Edinburgh in 1940, time and again depicted on television in race riots, Vietnam, and recent wars, that the American psyche is based on its own myths of the Wild West, of shoot first and ask questions afterwards. I find that Bush’s inarticulate delivery and vague bearing lead me to believe he is purely a mouthpiece for some very aggressive lobbyists. He seems to me to have about as much diplomatic delicacy as a seven pound sledge hammer. The trouble is this huge juggernaut called America, which for years was lying dormant, has suddenly woken up believing its own publicity, that it is a world leader. The precipitate action, and the unguarded utterances, with no reference to the outcome and the reactions of other nations, coupled with a strong political bias induced by the ethnic and fiscal balance at home, and subsidising rogue elements in other countries, should not be the stance of a great nation that considers itself to be a world leader, they are a prescription for strife.

    The Olympics, the mummy run, and railways. I can imagine that you are wondering. what twisted mind can link these three items – money as usual, today it links everything. I am heartily against the 2012 Olympics in Britain because I believe over the next five years our public coffers will be empty as a result of the proposed new housing programme, the two wars, bringing the infrastructure up to the level that it is acceptable, without even wasting it on something which so few of us can enjoy, except visually on the box, and that could be the case wherever it was held. We need money seriously for public transport. We must reduce those rush hours constituted by the mummy run, grasp the parking problems in towns and cities, all created because of a lack of public transport of a quality and quantity to make it viable. I believe nationally, we spend a tremendous amount of money both in fines and on wages just for parking, let alone the vast amounts on renewal and the construction of trunk roads, bypasses, and increasing the strength of the existing network to accommodate ever heavier and longer vehicles. We really need to re-examine the whole of our transport philosophy, with a view to getting the individual back into busses and trains, even if it means heavily subsidising. The cost to the individual of using public transport, especially over long distances seems extortionate, especially when the conditions of travel and pricing seem so unacceptable. Even our local bus has seats that only children can sit in really comfortably, because health and safety have cut down on the number of people standing, and, it appears, the bus companies, needing the passengers to make it pay, have increased the number of seats in the same area.

    Only those of us who lived at a time when all there was, was public transport, can be truly aware of what has been lost. Travelling on the Tube was always a torture, but on trams and buses one can relax and let the driver take the strain. In those days one didn’t have to wait long for trains, buses or trams, but today it is different.

  • Pre WW2, !930 to 39, in Search of Progress, 1920 to2000 plus

    What follows here, and several other posts in this vein, are narrow views of one person, not over-views determined by research. They are done mainly to determine how life has changed over 80 years.

    Take children; the phrase ‘children should be seen and not heard’, in its various forms, was a Victorian maxim people lived by in the 20s’s. Children’s opinions were rarely sought, they would sit in company, hardly moving, until given permission to go elsewhere, if they were lucky. Visiting relatives were rarely on speaking terms with them, and their visits occasioned the best of everything to be produced, and one had to be on one’s best behaviour. For a child to offer an opinion might be considered insolence, and could induce a crack round the ear. There was little or no traffic, other than horse-drawn vehicles or men pushing barrows.. Playing in the street therefore, was not only acceptable, it was expected. Children built up relationships with various delivery men, men with horse-drawn milk floats, coal men, bakers, and anyone else who would allow them to have a ride on their carts, in return for helping with deliveries, for a short time. Children ran after carts, and grabbed a lift on the back, when the driver wasn’t looking. Children either for the family, or to earn money, gathered the horse droppings in a bucket to use as fertiliser in back gardens.

    The change clearly came, with the advent of commercial motor vehicles – a gradual process in which change was not really noticeable in the street, or in the general life of the children, until World War II, a period of nearly 20 years.

    Family life; the two world wars seriously affected the size of families and the up bringing of children.. In the 20s and early 30s there were ‘Maiden Ladies’, unmarried women who lived at home, because the men they might have married were lying in rows, rotting in a foreign field. So the children of those who had married were looked after by their grandparents, their parents and the maiden aunts. Housing was in short supply with a building programme just getting underway. Hitler set it all back and once again extended families were forced to live together, resulting in children being cared for by a number of people. In the 60s all this changed, people’s aspirations became greater, with greater affluence, and a burgeoning housing programme. Families now lived in their own homes without the same amount of inter-parental care. There has been a steady change in domestic circumstances, through aspiration, necessity, or just keeping up with the Joneses, until we have arrived at the point where both parents are working, and the children are leading much less gregarious, and more singular lives.

    In the 20s wages were low, transport took time, families were large, and extended families could be colossal, so every aspect of life was determined by these factors and the class system. Then the classes varied in size tremendously. The upper class was a small group, very wealthy, with a total disregard in most cases for the plight of the under classes. The upper middle-class consisted of professionals, very successful businessmen, the clergy, schoolteachers and those with inherited wealth. The lower middle class or artisan class, included shopkeepers, businessmen and the like. The rest, the biggest class, were rubbing along on what amounted in most cases to a minimum wage – the working-class. It was the class system as much as anything throughout those years, which determined the limits of family life. In the 20s the upper class and the upper middle-class, would go on Continental holidays, stay in hotels here and abroad, drive cars, live in detached houses, or terraced houses in selective neighbourhoods, or in the country. The lower middle class generally lived in small terrace houses, might run a car, would holiday at a seaside resort, staying in a boarding house.. The working-class holiday was taken on the local Commons or with daily trips, if they could afford holidays at all ..From the 20s up until about 1930 there was little change, but in the late 30s change became much more rapid. Traffic increased, Woolworths came to London and expanded throughout the country, making competition for the working-class’s spending more competitive, and therefore increasing choice automatically. Motor vehicles were being used for transportation, with the result that private vehicles were regularly coming down in size and cost, and hence more common. With more spending there was more affluence, even for the working-class and the cycle effected great changes in the social boundaries, producing a flow of movement upward and downward between the classes, the beginning of what we have today